## 1.1 Linear Regression

The simplest linear regression model is the following, with a single predictor and a slope and intercept coefficient, and normally distributed noise. This model can be written using standard regression notation as

\[ y_n = \alpha + \beta x_n + \epsilon_n \ \ \ \mbox{where} \ \ \ \epsilon_n \sim \mathsf{normal}(0,\sigma). \] This is equivalent to the following sampling involving the residual, \[ y_n - (\alpha + \beta X_n) \sim \mathsf{normal}(0,\sigma), \] and reducing still further, to \[ y_n \sim \mathsf{normal}(\alpha + \beta X_n, \, \sigma). \]

This latter form of the model is coded in Stan as follows.

```
data {
int<lower=0> N;
vector[N] x;
vector[N] y;
}
parameters {
real alpha;
real beta;
real<lower=0> sigma;
}
model {
y ~ normal(alpha + beta * x, sigma);
}
```

There are `N`

observations, each with predictor `x[n]`

and
outcome `y[n]`

. The intercept and slope parameters are
`alpha`

and `beta`

. The model assumes a normally
distributed noise term with scale `sigma`

. This model has
improper priors for the two regression coefficients.

### Matrix Notation and Vectorization

The sampling statement in the previous model is vectorized, with

` y ~ normal(alpha + beta * x, sigma);`

providing the same model as the unvectorized version,

```
for (n in 1:N)
y[n] ~ normal(alpha + beta * x[n], sigma);
```

In addition to being more concise, the vectorized form is much faster.^{1}

In general, Stan allows the arguments to distributions such as
`normal`

to be vectors. If any of the other arguments are vectors or
arrays, they have to be the same size. If any of the other arguments
is a scalar, it is reused for each vector entry. See the
vectorization section for more information on
vectorization of probability functions.

The other reason this works is that Stan’s arithmetic operators are
overloaded to perform matrix arithmetic on matrices. In this case,
because `x`

is of type `vector`

and `beta`

of type
`real`

, the expression `beta * x`

is of type `vector`

.
Because Stan supports vectorization, a regression model with more than
one predictor can be written directly using matrix notation.

```
data {
int<lower=0> N; // number of data items
int<lower=0> K; // number of predictors
matrix[N, K] x; // predictor matrix
vector[N] y; // outcome vector
}
parameters {
real alpha; // intercept
vector[K] beta; // coefficients for predictors
real<lower=0> sigma; // error scale
}
model {
y ~ normal(x * beta + alpha, sigma); // likelihood
}
```

The constraint `lower=0`

in the declaration of `sigma`

constrains the value to be greater than or equal to 0. With no prior
in the model block, the effect is an improper prior on non-negative
real numbers. Although a more informative prior may be added, improper
priors are acceptable as long as they lead to proper posteriors.

In the model above, `x`

is an \(N \times K\) matrix of predictors
and `beta`

a \(K\)-vector of coefficients, so `x * beta`

is an
\(N\)-vector of predictions, one for each of the \(N\) data items. These
predictions line up with the outcomes in the \(N\)-vector `y`

, so
the entire model may be written using matrix arithmetic as shown. It
would be possible to include a column of ones the data matrix `x`

and
remove the `alpha`

parameter.

The sampling statement in the model above is just a more efficient, vector-based approach to coding the model with a loop, as in the following statistically equivalent model.

```
model {
for (n in 1:N)
y[n] ~ normal(x[n] * beta, sigma);
}
```

With Stan’s matrix indexing scheme, `x[n]`

picks out row `n`

of the matrix `x`

; because `beta`

is a column vector,
the product `x[n] * beta`

is a scalar of type `real`

.

#### Intercepts as Inputs

In the model formulation

` y ~ normal(x * beta, sigma);`

there is no longer an intercept coefficient `alpha`

. Instead, we
have assumed that the first column of the input matrix `x`

is a
column of 1 values. This way, `beta[1]`

plays the role of the
intercept. If the intercept gets a different prior than the slope
terms, then it would be clearer to break it out. It is also slightly
more efficient in its explicit form with the intercept variable
singled out because there’s one fewer multiplications; it should not
make that much of a difference to speed, though, so the choice should
be based on clarity.