This is an old version, view current version.

Optimization

Stan provides optimization algorithms which find modes of the density specified by a Stan program. Such modes may be used as parameter estimates or as the basis of approximations to a Bayesian posterior.

Stan provides three different optimizers, a Newton optimizer, and two related quasi-Newton algorithms, BFGS and L-BFGS; see Nocedal and Wright (2006) for thorough description and analysis of all of these algorithms. The L-BFGS algorithm is the default optimizer. Newton’s method is the least efficient of the three, but has the advantage of setting its own stepsize.

General configuration

All of the optimizers have the option of including the the log absolute Jacobian determinant of inverse parameter transforms in the log probability computation. Without the Jacobian adjustment, optimization returns the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE), ${\mathrm{argmax}}_{\theta }p(y|\theta )$, the value which maximizes the likelihood of the data given the parameters. Applying the Jacobian adjustment produces the maximum a posteriori estimate (MAP), that maximizes the value of the posterior density in the unconstrained space, ${\mathrm{argmax}}_{\theta }p(y|\theta )p(\theta )$.

All of the optimizers are iterative and allow the maximum number of iterations to be specified; the default maximum number of iterations is 2000.

All of the optimizers are able to stream intermediate output reporting on their progress. Whether or not to save the intermediate iterations and stream progress is configurable.

BFGS and L-BFGS configuration

Convergence monitoring

Convergence monitoring in (L-)BFGS is controlled by a number of tolerance values, any one of which being satisfied causes the algorithm to terminate with a solution. Any of the convergence tests can be disabled by setting its corresponding tolerance parameter to zero. The tests for convergence are as follows.

Parameter convergence

The parameters ${\theta }_i$ in iteration $i$ are considered to have converged with respect to tolerance tol_param if

$$||{\theta }_i-{\theta }_{i-1}||<\mathtt{tol}\mathtt{\_}\mathtt{param}.$$

Density convergence

The (unnormalized) log density $\log p({\theta }_i|y)$ for the parameters ${\theta }_i$ in iteration $i$ given data $y$ is considered to have converged with respect to tolerance tol_obj if

$$|\log p({\theta }_i|y)-\log p({\theta }_{i-1}|y)|<\mathtt{tol}\mathtt{\_}\mathtt{obj}.$$

The log density is considered to have converged to within relative tolerance tol_rel_obj if

$$\frac{|\log p({\theta }_i|y)-\log p({\theta }_{i-1}|y)|}{max(|\log p({\theta }_i|y)|,|\log p({\theta }_{i-1}|y)|,1.0)}<\mathtt{tol}\mathtt{\_}\mathtt{rel}\mathtt{\_}\mathtt{obj}\ast ϵ.$$

Gradient convergence

The gradient is considered to have converged to 0 relative to a specified tolerance tol_grad if

$$||g_i||<\mathtt{tol}\mathtt{\_}\mathtt{grad},$$ where ${\mathrm{\nabla }}_{\theta }$ is the gradient operator with respect to $\theta$ and $g_i={\mathrm{\nabla }}_{\theta }\log p(\theta |y)$ is the gradient at iteration $i$ evaluated at ${\theta }^{(i)}$, the value on the $i$-th posterior iteration.

The gradient is considered to have converged to 0 relative to a specified relative tolerance tol_rel_grad if

$$\frac{g_i^T{\hat{H}}_i^{-1}{g}_i}{max(|\log p({\theta }_i|y)|,1.0)}<\mathtt{tol}\mathtt{\_}\mathtt{rel}\mathtt{\_}\mathtt{grad}\ast ϵ,$$

where ${\hat{H}}_i$ is the estimate of the Hessian at iteration $i$, $|u|$ is the absolute value (L1 norm) of $u$, $||u||$ is the vector length (L2 norm) of $u$, and $ϵ\approx 2e-16$ is machine precision.

Initial step size

The initial step size parameter $\alpha$ for BFGS-style optimizers may be specified. If the first iteration takes a long time (and requires a lot of function evaluations) initialize $\alpha$ to be the roughly equal to the $\alpha$ used in that first iteration. The default value is intentionally small, 0.001, which is reasonable for many problems but might be too large or too small depending on the objective function and initialization. Being too big or too small just means that the first iteration will take longer (i.e., require more gradient evaluations) before the line search finds a good step length. It’s not a critical parameter, but for optimizing the same model multiple times (as you tweak things or with different data), being able to tune $\alpha$ can save some real time.

L-BFGS history size

L-BFGS has a command-line argument which controls the size of the history it uses to approximate the Hessian. The value should be less than the dimensionality of the parameter space and, in general, relatively small values (5–10) are sufficient; the default value is 5.

If L-BFGS performs poorly but BFGS performs well, consider increasing the history size. Increasing history size will increase the memory usage, although this is unlikely to be an issue for typical Stan models.

Writing models for optimization

Constrained vs. unconstrained parameters

For constrained optimization problems, for instance, with a standard deviation parameter $\sigma$ constrained so that $\sigma >0$, it can be much more efficient to declare a parameter sigma with no constraints. This allows the optimizer to easily get close to 0 without having to tend toward $-\mathrm{\infty }$ on the $\log \sigma$ scale.

With unconstrained parameterizations of parameters with constrained support, it is important to provide a custom initialization that is within the support. For example, declaring a vector

vector[M] sigma;

and using the default random initialization which is $\mathsf{Uniform}(-2,2)$ on the unconstrained scale means that there is only a $2^{-M}$ chance that the initialization will be within support.

For any given optimization problem, it is probably worthwhile trying the program both ways, with and without the constraint, to see which one is more efficient.

References

Nocedal, Jorge, and Stephen J. Wright. 2006. Numerical Optimization. Second. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.